JUST think of it again.they will say there is no confusion.bcoz they were taught false faith.?

Look at this total confusion;jesus depend on father,christians depend on jesus,what amess in faith?


It only becomes complex if you wish it to be. God is the living word and Jesus was God incarnate.wow.jesus is son of god.jesus was there before all.yes jesus use to cry for help!(eloi!eloi!)jesus use to pray!jesus use to perform miracles with the power of GOD almighty(father).but unfortunatly we depend more on jesus than the father.dont coment if you know nothing about the 14 different bibles please.jesus use to ran away from enemies.use to seek for help.could do nothing without the help of GOD.IS IT father to be worshiped or jesus to be worshiped.please dont get confusedJUST think of it again.they will say there is no confusion.bcoz they were taught false faith.?
Neither one. It is you who is confused. It is The Holy Spirit who we are to know and understand, She is THE ONE who is responsible for revealing ALL TRUTH to us. Know Her and know the truth. Know Her not and remain confused.JUST think of it again.they will say there is no confusion.bcoz they were taught false faith.?
I don't get confused because I haven't fallen for all the stories since I turned 8 years old. My mother taught me to THINK.
Had God two begotten sons?


This mystical suggestion is further supported with Jesus being called the only begotten Son of God. In Psalm 2:7, the Lord said to David: ';...Thou art my son: this day have I begotten thee.';


Does this mean that God had two sons? Jesus also said that God is not only his Father but also your Father (Matthew 5:45, 48). Luke 3:38 says: ';...Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the Son of God.';


Who is mentioned in Hebrews 7:3 as like unto the Son of God? It is Melchisedec, King of Salem, as mentioned in Hebrews 7:1. He (Melchisedec) is more unique than Jesus or Adam. Why is he not preferred to be the Son of God? Moreover, Adam did not have a mother or father, but was the first human being created by God and in the likeness of God to exist in the Garden of Eden and on earth. Wouldn’t this give more rights to Adam to be called the Son of God in its truest meaning?





People think Jesus is god but he says “Why do you call me good”? Can god be not good?


I would like to share with you an obvious contradiction between John 3:16, Luke 10:25-28 and Matthew 19:16-17. John 3:16 reads: ';For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten, Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.';


Now let’s read Luke 10:25-28: And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, what is written in the law? How readest Thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and Thou shalt live.





Why demons and damned people think Jesus is son of god?


In Luke 4:41, Jesus refused to be called the Son of God by demons. Do you think that Jesus would rebuke the demons, or anyone else for that matter, for telling the truth? Unquestionably, no! Jesus rebuked the demons because they were saying something false by calling him the Son of God. Also, if the demons knew that Jesus was the Christ, for Jesus to shut them up because they called him the Christ is a contradiction to Jesus’ mission.


In Luke 9:20 %26amp; 21, Jesus said unto his disciples:


';But who say ye that I am? Peter answered saying, ';The Christ of God, and Jesus straightly charged them and commanded them to tell no man that thing.';


Furthermore, verses like John 3:2, John 6:14, John 7:40, Matthew 21:11, Luke 7:16 and 24:19 confirm that Jesus accepted the title of teacher, Prophet and called himself the son of man in Matthew 8:20, 12:40, 17:9 %26amp; 12, 26:24, Luke 9:26, 22:48, 22:69, and 24:7. The most conclusive verse that says Jesus is the son (servant) of man is Mark 14:26 where Jesus is mentioning the Day of Reckoning. Jesus specifically said we would see the son of man, not the Son of God, sitting in the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.





Is there any single, unequivocal statement in the Bible whereby Jesus himself declares, ';I am God, therefore worship me.';


The act of begetting is a physical act and such act is against God’s nature. The Qur’an 19:35 says:


';It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! When He determines a matter He only says to it ';Be,'; and it is.'; (Maryam 19:35)


The teachings of Jesus as the Son of God were not preached by Jesus nor accepted by Jesus, but were taught by Paul as supported in Acts 9:20: ';And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.'; Did Jesus ever claim to be God or say, ';Here am I, your God, worship me';? The answer is no. For there is no single, unequivocal statement in the Bible whereby Jesus himself declares, ';I am God, therefore worship me.'; Virtually all of the more than two thousand verses of the epistles of Paul are his own fabrications to include Romans 9:5 that says, depending upon which Bible you read: ';...Christ came, who is overall, the eternally blessed God.';





Gospels of Paul.


Christians should know that Paul himself mentions his own gospel, not Jesus, in his epistle to the Romans when he says in Romans 2:16: ';In the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel.';


In face, the Pauline epistle to the Romans serves as the foundation of today’s Christianity. Thus, it is the Christians whose efforts will be wasted in this life as they think they were acquiring good by their works when they attribute partners to God, as stated in Chapter 18:103-106 of the Qur’an: ';Say: Shall we tell you of those who lost most in respect of their deeds? Those whose efforts have been wasted in this life, while they thought that they were acquiring good by their works?'; they are those who deny the Signs of their Lord and the fact of their having to meet Him (in the Hereafter): vain will be their works, nor shall We, on the Day of judgment, give them any weight. That is their reward, Hell; because they rejected Faith, and took My Signs and My Messengers by way of jest. (Al-Kahf 18:103-106)





Was Saint Paul a ‘prophet’.


Indeed, it is so strange and ironic, knowing that none of Paul’s epistle to the Romans, more than 430 verses, were ever formulated by Jesus. Paul should have made direct reference to the pristine teachings of Jesus, if only the former claim for apostleship by divine inspiration was indeed true. Instead, large parts of his epistles’ Biblical quotations (notably those in the Epistle to the Romans) were taken from the Old Testament – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Hosea. His epistles were, indeed a product of tedious efforts, but that does not make Paul far better than any of the other men who authored the Bible, nor does it make him a Prophet.