Immortality of the soul
Ezekiel 18:4
Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10
A fiery place of torment (Hell)
1 John 4:8 A loving God wouldn't invent such a place
Idols included in worship (crosses statues etc)
Exodus 20:4,5
There are many other activities, such as involving themselves in politics
John 18:36
%26amp; Fighting in wars
Exodus 20:13
http://www.watchtower.org/e/kn37/article…
http://www.watchtower.org/e/20070301/art…Besides the trinity teaching, what other lies are taught by false Christianity?
That its acceptable to kill our fellowman and even those of the same faith, in warfare. I have actually just finished a book where the author (a theologian) tries to defend his stance on this issue. Loving our neighbour means just that - it cannot be diluted by the demands of our own government. The author used the example of warring Jews in the Hebrew scriptures but forgot that Christ fulfilled the LAW and replaced the commandments with just 2 - love God and love our neighbour
Note: sorry but I think your question is a little loaded as I dont think trinity supporters will take kindly to being called liars. There are a lot of sincere people who beleive in the trinity. Tact and diplomacy are required when showing the biblical evidence against this beliefBesides the trinity teaching, what other lies are taught by false Christianity?
The Trinity can be described by this extraordinarily simple mathematical model:
1 X 1 X 1 = 1
The dogma is slightly more difficult to understand.
As for scripture ... better get back to that Bible and look around a bit more.
You won't find the specific word ';Trinity'; in the Bible, but the Holy Trinity is described there quite nicely, and often by Jesus Christ, himself.
The trinity is not a lie.
It means that it needs three element to complete a circle.
For example: Male + Female = Baby it is finished that's all you can get from it. It will always turn around and around.
Again: Intention + Action = Result after that result it will inspire someone else to use that result and act on it. This will create an other result. This again and again.
Even more : A need creates a desire and than an action ....
That is what trinity means.
i get f** uped by this- jesus is the morning star
than i read lucifer is son of dawn and lucifer is known as the morning and evening star- ok which one is the morning star- jesus or lucifer? yeah and lucifer was a saint/ but he has a goddess mother named eos( also known as dawn) but god supposedly created him and he's a fallen angel. check out this link about morningstar jesus and morningstar lucifer
http://jesus-is-lord.com/nivsatan.htm
The teachings of the Church contradict the teachings of Jesus (pbuh) and that is the cause of the confusion.
Priests talk of trinity as ';It is a Mystery, not explained by Jesus (pbuh) clearly';, at that time again those forget that Jesus (pbuh) said,
';I spoke openly to the world. I always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where the Jews always meet, and in secret I have said nothing'; (John 18:20 (NKJ)).
If trinity is confusing enough to be called a mystery, it cannot be from God. Because:
';God is not a God of confusion.';—1 Corinthians 14:33, Revised Standard Version (RS).
There was no mystery in the message of Jesus (pbuh), nothing secret. Will you accept the priests' so called ';mystery of trinity'; and forget clear commandments of Jesus (pbuh)?
Jesus (pbuh) numerous times clearly not only told us about oneness of God, but also clearly told his that He is the only one, his God, our God, and your God, eg..
1) Mark 12:29: ';the Lord our God, the lord is One';.
2) Matthew 4:10 ';You shall worship the Lord, your God, and him only you shall serve';
3) Matthew 27:46: ';Eloi (Allah?) , Eloi, lama sabachthani?'; -- which means, ';My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?';
Just not that, he proved it by worshipping Him only:
Metthew: 26:39: ';He went a little farther and fell on His face and prayed';
Will you go by above clear commandments of Jesus, or will you follow interpretation of people on these vague words in KJV that people try to use in desperate attempt to prove divinity of Jesus:
eg following two verses are most often used by people who have already believed that Jesus is God / or one third of God, without even understanding Jesus teachings.
1) John 10:30 (KJV) ';I and my Father are one.';
You should also see where all '; x + x are one'; used in Bible to understand the perspective. eg,
';So keep them safe by the power of the name that you have given me. Then they will be one with each other, just as you and I are one.';
';They will be saved with eachother, the way I am saved with you.';
Does it mean that 11 deciphers were actually one?
It definately means one in purpose, that's all. (John 17:11 and 22). It is all upon how it has been translated.
2) 1 John 5:7-8
(KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
But then people forget again, that it is a matter of translation from a dead language. As same verse has been translated in totally different way from the original also.
(RSV) [7] And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth. [8] There are three witnesses, the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree.
(NKJV) Footnote - NU-Text and M-Text omit the words from in heaven (verse 7) through on earth (verse 8). Only four or five very late manuscripts contain these words in Greek.
(1901 ASV) 7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth.
and so many others , (NIV) 7 , (NWT) 7 , (NASV) 7 , (ESV) 7, (HCSB) 7 , (NAB-Roman Catholic) 7 ,(CEV) 7
Also people forget whether these verses are coming from original scripture or has been added to Bible.
John 5:7 ,,,, was thrown out of it in RSV. by 32 scholars of highest eminent, backed by 50 cooperating denominations.
G. W. and D. E. Anderson in his book ';WHY 1 JOHN 5.7–8 IS IN THE BIBLE'; mentions referring to different scholars:
All around us is scholarly argument against the inclusion of this passage. As John Stott says of verse 7,
The words do not occur in any Greek MS, version or quotation before the fifteenth century. They first appear in an obscure fourth-century Latin MS and found their way into the AV because Erasmus reluctantly included them in the third edition of his text. They are rightly absent even from the margin of RV and RSV. [4]
The trinity is a doctrine from about the year 325 AD, It has its roots in polytheism,
The New Catholic Encyclopedia - 1967, VOL. XIV, PAGE 299:
The formulation ';one God in three Persons'; was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, PRIOR TO THE END OF THE 4TH CENTURY. But it is precisely this formulation that first claimed to title ';The Trinitarian Dogma. AMONG THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS, THERE HAD BEEN NOTHING EVEN REMOTELY APPROACHING SUCH A MENTALITY OR PERSPECTIVE.
You should not accept the word “son” literally . Word ';son'; was used in bible for general human beings and other prophets also. ';we all are the children of father in heavens'; indicates that word ';son'; was used in different meaning of love and care. Mathew: 5:9. ';Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the sons of God.”
that god accepts everyone just as they are. That something inside you goes floating around when you die. That all religions are just fine. That you can speak to your dead loved ones.....
And I suppose you know true Christianity??
';rapture';
and just what do you mean by ';trinity teaching';?
There are no lies in Christianity.
I suppose the one most relevant to you is that non-trinitarians are heretics.
peace
One big whopper is this: The oneness is heresy!
I don't think anything can top that one!!
No comments:
Post a Comment